|
Think
"new music" and 9 out of 10 people will think "just-released
songs on the radio." I guess I'd have to include myself,
at least occasionally, since one of my proudest moments as
a dad was telling my then 13-year-old son I'd just heard the
first local airing of the newest song by Bad Religion. He
was envious. Among the various genres of popular music, the
new is desirable, preferred, awaited. Unfortunately, that
is not true in the world I usually occupy, that of new concert
music, or "contemporary classical" music. There,
the new is merely endured, when it's not overtly suppressed.
On Oct. 8, at Phoenix Art Museum's Whiteman Hall, adjacent
to the Museum's permanent contemporary exhibit, nearly 200
people heard five recent works by living Arizona composers.
To judge from their response, these concertgoers more than
merely endured what they heard; they found in it some unique
take on existence, some new way of feeling the world, an experience
to carry with them into their daily lives. If so, then the
thousands of hours that went into the composing, preparation,
rehearsal and performance of 90 minutes of new music that
afternoon achieved exactly what was intended.
(To contrast the facts of our little concert to some similar
report in popular music would be to court ridicule. Two hundred
people? How would that look at the Celebrity Theater? Yet,
given the audience base for classical music, and the still
smaller base for new classical works, that was an excellent
turnout. While some pieces of mine have enjoyed audiences
in the high hundreds or even low thousands when performed
by major groups, such as the Phoenix Symphony or Arizona State
University, the numbers for presentations of smaller-scaled
new scores can be much tinier. I've had scores "premiered"
for a dozen people.)
Called "New Music Arizona," the event was the brainchild
of Howard Hendler, whose passion for all things new helped
fuel – and fund – the building of the Museum's
new contemporary wing. "You can have Whiteman Hall the
afternoon of Sunday, Oct. 8, for music by any Arizona composers
you want to present," Howard told me one afternoon. Talk
about good news/bad news. A free space in a major venue, one
with a built-in potential audience, and one that had yet to
hear the strains of music composed by living locals. Hooray!
All I had to do was spend several weeks of work assembling
the composers, the performers and, joy of joys, the funding.
It wasn't difficult finding the composers; the challenge lay
in choosing a handful for this outing. Arizona is blessed
with many composers of infinite variety and high quality.
In an ideal world, I'd have presented seven of them, even
eight or nine, but practicalities dictated otherwise. I picked
five: James DeMars, Judith Lang Zaimont, Henry Flurry, Alycia
de Mesa, and myself. (If you thought I'd pass up the opportunity
to perform my music for a new audience, you don't understand
the composer mentality. We live for that.) The five represent
a pretty decent geographical profile of Arizona, with DeMars
a Tempean (he's on faculty at Arizona State University's School
of Music), de Mesa and myself Phoenicians, Flurry a Prescottian,
and Zaimont, late of Minnesota, a resident of the town of
Maricopa in Pinal County. Missing was my own hometown of Tucson.
Among many other Phoenix-area composers, I had hoped also
to include Warren Cohen and Christopher Scinto. Perhaps, if
this concert blossoms into a series at Whiteman, Museum audiences
will next time greet music by Cohen, Scinto, a Tucson composer
or two and another composer from ASU's illustrious faculty.
Each composer for the Oct. 8 concert was responsible for hiring
and paying performers. This is the great wall that divides
composers from other creative artists. When a painter is finished,
the art is finished. When a novelist completes a book, it
remains only for a publisher to print, bind and sell it. But
for composers, as for playwrights, being finished means you've
just begun. Put the last slur on the final phrase of your
new sonata and then you need to find performers, a venue for
the performance, and a way to pay the performers. Even when
you've been commissioned to compose a piece, and the headaches
of performer/venue/pay are lifted, completing a piece means
turning it over to a conductor or a pianist or a singer and
saying, "It's yours now." As with all human relationships
of trust, this can lead to bliss, rage, humiliation, or a
combination of all three.
One of our composers transcended this problem by being her
own performer. De Mesa, a harpist, belongs to the dwindling
category (in classical music, at least) of composer-performer.
In my case, the talented, Prescott-based percussionist Maria
Flurry had commissioned a percussion concerto from me, so
my star performer was built-in. The also talented and similarly
Prescott-based Henry Flurry (husband to the latter Flurry)
had also received a commission, this time for the unlikely
union of marimba and tuba, while Zaimont's piece turned out
to be a saxophone quartet already championed by the Tucson
group called Presidio Quartet, and DeMars chose his ASU colleague
Katherine McLin to play his Tapestry IX, an unaccompanied
violin sonata.
All five scores had something in common: none of them featured
piano, to his was fortunate, as Whiteman Hall does not posses
a piano. There's a fine grand at the Museum café, rarely
played, but Whiteman is without one. Go figure. In the case
of the Flurry concerto, dubbed Canto de Alba, keyboard was
one of the accompanying instruments, so we used an electronic
instrument in place of the acoustic real thing. My own piece
would not have happened without the passion, the creativity,
and the out-and-out insistence of its solo performer and commissioner.
Maria Flurry found funding among her personal patrons to commission
the piece, and then, when it appeared the accompaniment to
her concerto would have to be performed as a MIDI file, proceeded
to knock on doors until she found funding (from the Musicians'
Union) for a small chamber ensemble.
Human experience is infinite in its potential, and music reflects
experience. When "new music" is limited only to
certain genres, the experience reflected is necessarily limited
as well. Open up new music to every conceivable individual
vision, and you can get the sort of varied program presented
that day. We need more new music in every context, especially
the so-called "classical." Classical music groups
that shun living composers do classical music no good. A tradition
uncontinued will quickly become an artifact.
Outside Whiteman Hall is the Phoenix Art Museum's magnificent
display of contemporary visual art. On Oct. 8, thanks to the
Museum, there was also a display of contemporary sonic art
inside Whiteman. We can only hope it wasn't a onetime thing.
|